Tom Price, M.D.

A Georgia congressman's scientific approach to policy making

Congressman Tom Price, M.D., is known for his scientific approach to legislation. Since his election to the Georgia Senate in 1996, the Roswell surgeon was named majority leader in 2002 and is the first Republican to hold that post in Georgia's history. He now represents Georgia's 6th congressional district, which includes portions of Cherokee, Cobb and Fulton counties.

In Congress, Price will support reforming the tax system, strengthening healthcare and education, bringing common sense to the litigation system, and finding transportation solutions for Atlanta's residents and commuters. He also will work to eliminate the capital gains tax, enact the FairTax plan, and secure the future of Medicare. Price favors allowing individual states the autonomy to improve schools as well.

Of particular importance to Georgia physicians is Price's key interest in medical malpractice liability reform. He favors a $250,000 limit on jury awards for pain and suffering caused by malpractice.

It's only logical that Price use a methodical approach to his legislative duties, after years of being taught to understand a patient's medical problems and anticipate the various outcomes of treatments. The road ahead will mean educating himself on the ins and outs of the U.S. House of Representatives, and Price already has delved into a downloadable rulebook for new members of Congress. Always a student, the congressman will approach his seat in Congress in a sensible manner: Learn the rules, and then apply them intelligently and effectively.

Georgia Physician recently talked with Congressman Price about being a physician who is an elected politician. Following is what he had to say.

Georgia Physician: When did you become interested in politics?

Congressman Tom Price, M.D.: When I was growing up, I came to understand that political decisions affected our lives and decisions in a very direct way. That knowledge and an interest in the process of political activities and decisions have led to my active involvement at many different levels.

GP: At face value, it seems there are many contrasts between politics and practicing medicine. What traits have allowed you to progress in each with success?

Price: I think physicians are well suited for politics and policy-making. We are trained to follow the scientific method of decision making, which dictates a systematic process for the identification of problems and institution of solutions. This would work well for public policy also.

GP: Physicians are vital parts of our communities, but it seems few pursue elected offices. Why do you think more physicians aren't involved? Do you see physicians' participation increasing?

Price: Physicians tend not to be involved as candidates because our core work is extremely demanding and does not lend itself well to doing something else "on the side." However, we are seen as natural leaders in our communities, regardless of specialty or location. When I speak with medical student groups, this is one of the things I try to stress. We have seen an increase in the number of physicians seeking office and becoming elected at all levels. I think there has been a growing appreciation for the power of politics over both doctors and their patients. Many decisions that have been made have not been productive or helpful for the health of our patients. It is so remarkably important to be involved.

GP: Was your position in 1996 as a Georgia senator your first elected position?

Price: Though I had been active in supporting candidates and working on campaigns for years, I didn't run for office until 1996. I was fortunate to win that first election and to be re-elected to the State Senate three more times.

GP: Medical malpractice liability reform is always a major issue for physicians in Georgia. While you were a senator, the Georgia House and Senate approved bills addressing tort reform that were approved and, subsequently, dropped. You were adamant that any tort reform would contain provisions to limit jury awards to $250,000. How would this benefit Georgia residents and physicians?

Price: During my eight years in the State Senate, I worked constantly with others to adopt substantive legal system reform. My concern, which has been borne out by the facts and history, is that increased medical malpractice liability premiums drastically increase the cost of healthcare through the practice of defensive medicine. More importantly, they cause a decrease in the quality of our care by markedly decreasing access to that care. This is the real reason why all should be alarmed at our current court system. Having predictable liability costs goes a long way toward ending defensive medicine and increasing access to quality care. A limitation on non-economic damages Š not economic or real damages Š greatly assists this predictability.

GP: What do you think the future holds for tort reform in Georgia? Do you believe we will see legislation that will limit jury awards in the near future?

Price: I am so very proud of the State Senate and House, who acted responsibly and expeditiously this year to adopt sweeping changes to our court system that will be very positive for all patients across our state. The bill that was passed, and signed by the governor, includes many parameters that we have fought for over a number of years, not the least of which is a limitation of non-economic awards.

GP: Your campaign in 2004 for Georgia's 6th District in the U.S. House of Representatives was based on, among other issues, reforming the tax system and strengthening healthcare and education. Please touch on each of these issues and how your experience as a physician has influenced your position.

Price: As a third-generation physician, I have personally witnessed the drastic changes to our healthcare system over the past 40 years. It is clear to me that state and federal intervention into the practice of medicine has been, in many respects, to the detriment of patients. The power of government may be used for good or ill purposes. I believe that we should be making decisions that empower individuals and allow all the greatest opportunity to realize their dreams. Whether you're talking about our tax system, healthcare or education, the principles should be the same: work to increase freedom and opportunity, enhance individual responsibility and accomplishment, and ensure liberty for future generations.

GP: Obstetricians, neurologists, anesthesiologists and other doctors have seen great increases in malpractice insurance premiums increase with no apparent end in sight. You support arbitration to help alleviate this cost pressure. What other remedies can be explored to help Georgia's physicians with increasing malpractice premiums?

Price: I believe that the fundamental problem with our current liability system is there is too much money on the table. This turns our courts into a lottery for both plaintiffs and their attorneys, essentially transforming counsel into co-plaintiffs. There are many ways to change the model and realign incentives for justice. Among the most far-reaching and effective solutions would be instituting a binding, mandatory arbitration system. This would allow experts from each side to reach a resolution that would be binding and determined by people familiar with medical care and knowledgeable about the action provision of that care.

GP: A few years ago, large pharmaceutical companies began an initiative to market directly to consumers. Now, even large orthopedic implant and device companies are employing the same strategy. Having a more knowledgeable and informed patient should be good. But are physicians in a tough spot when a patient comes in requesting a brand of drug or implant?

Price: Direct marketing has certainly changed the dynamic of certain clinical decisions that are currently being made. This is not necessarily a bad thing. However, the physician must be able to make the best recommendation for care he or she believes to be appropriate without undue fear of liability. This is another reason for the imperative of lawsuit abuse reform.

GP: In what ways do you believe the typical Georgia physician is special or unique?

Price: Physicians in Georgia and across our nation are truly champions today. They are working as hard as possible to deliver the finest healthcare available in spite of unbearable obstacles being placed in the way both administratively and medically. The only thing holding our current healthcare system together is the altruism of the physician and other providers.

GP: What are the most important issues facing Georgia physicians today?

Price: We continue to move in a direction where more non-medical people are making medical decisions. The most important issue is the imperative of putting patients back in charge of their healthcare.

GP: Looking into your crystal ball, describe what we will see from Washington, D.C., during the 109th Congress, over the next 5 years and over the next 20 years that will affect Georgia physicians.

Price: This year, the U.S. House of Representatives will once again adopt comprehensive lawsuit abuse reform. The challenge is for the U. S. Senate to positively respond to our bill. With the changes on that side of the Capitol, it is possible we'll be able to get something adopted within this current Congress. The future for physicians is exciting and challenging. Scientific advances will allow us to offer our patients better and continually advancing quality of care. Whether our profession will be able to exercise the independence necessary to provide that quality care to our patients remains to be seen. We are approaching a time of decision making that will determine the answer to this within the next few years. My challenge to all of my colleagues is to actively engage in this debate. Silence will be presumed to be endorsement of our current trend. I am optimistic that with hard work and persistence, we will ensure an independent profession able to advance the cause of health for all our citizens. nGP
The Tom Price File Birthplace:
Lansing, Mich.

Education:
Bachelor - University of Michigan
Doctor of Medicine - University of Michigan, 1979

Family:
Wife - Elizabeth Clark Price, M.D.
Son - Robert, age 15

Interests:
Cooking, Reading, History

Last books read:
"Lend Me Your Ears" by William Safire; "The Collapse of the Common Good" by Philip Howard

Last vacation destination:
Prince Edward Island, Canada

Inspiration:
"My mom, who essentially raised five children single-handedly. She always kept a cheerful, persistent nature and inspired in me a conviction that nothing was out of reach for anyone."

In 5 years?
"I hope to continue to be actively involved in formulating policy that ensures greater freedom, individual responsibility and opportunity."

In 20 years?
"My grandfather practiced medicine until he was 94 years old; I think I received a significant portion of his genes. I canÕt imagine a time when I wouldnÕt be working to positively affect public policy, either through elective office or other avenues."

Copyright 2005 - Medical Distribution Solutions, Inc., 5445 Triangle Parkway, Suite 170, Norcross GA 30092